Dare to invade Iran?

‘Have your say’ BBC World had discussed about the situation in Iran on 11 March.
The topic was
“Sanctions, air strikes or more negotiations - how should the world deal with a nuclear Iran?”

I watched the discussion (viewers are allowed to call in and send email / SMS to BBC), what drives me mad during the one hour show is the anchor keep repeating the mistake of reading ‘nuclear technology’ as ‘nuclear weapon’ on viewers e mail. Once she corrected it, while the next one she didn’t. She also tried to manipulate ppls view regarding this issue to follow what she suggests. The anchor is not alone there, but with a guy apposing nuclear in Iran (from the intelligence if im not mistaken). I think it is fairer if personel from both sides (against and for negotiation) were called into the studio.

Lots of callers were opposing the sanction on Iran’s nuclear technology, only one, I believe a Jewish guy (bcos he is from Israel, can’t even speak proper English), agreed with all method of inhibition. He labeled peace Iran as regime, instead of seeing his country as the actual regime. That’s pure idiocy.

Since most of the callers were opposing the sanction, and believe that the nuclear technology in Iran is for peaceful purposes. So the guest on the show, have to answer all the viewers argument, and his main points of views were:

1. Iran kept secret the nuclear development bfor, so they seem to have a bad intention on the purpose of their nuclear program
Well, if Iran had made it open in earlier stage of the development, I think Iran will face an earlier sanction, and they wont have what they have now, nuclear power. Iraq is the best example.

2. Iran is not prohibited to have nuclear technology (for electricity generation), what they are not allowed is to further enriched the uranium (which can be used for more than just electricity but other purposes as well including nuclear weapon).
When ppls argue that Iran have the rights, he state that Ahmadinejad have intention to wipe out Israel. Doesn’t he read the news? Actually, Ahmadinejad didn’t really mean that. It is misinterpreted (I think more to manipulated) by the media due to translation to English. Even it is for weapon, still they have right to (they dont have any records in war crime)
Why the Zionist that clearly practice genocide, don’t face similar sanction?

Another thing I loathe is the way they put down the topic
“…how should the world deal with a nuclear Iran?”
It is actually not the world, but the States.

Iranian government even allows video surveillance system in their nuclear facilities is having trouble. Instead, the Zionist that doesn’t even allow any IAEA inspection gets away with any form of sanction. That’s a double standard.

IMO the States had a terrible lesson from Iraq invasion, and if they are wise enough, the invasion will not going to happen in Iranian land.

Ps We as consumers have the power of sanction, Dont buy any products related to the Zionist (I was sceptical bfor regarding this) but since, I had found a site that list down all the products with sufficient references and not just claim, I am no longer hesitate to boycott and look for the alternatives. Im now working on the list. Among major companies in the list that are popular in Msia are Starbuck, McDonalds, Danone and much more. Ill do further research, simplify the list and post it here in the near future. InsyaAllah.